Transparent Barrier Coatings for Plastic Films: PHPS or Organopolysilazane?-Iota

Products

News

Office Address:	Sunmoon Science Park, 985 Xingzhong Road, High-Tech Zone, Bengbu, China
Factory Address:	Mohekou Industrial Park, Huaishang District, Bengbu, Anhui, China
Contact:	Amina Zhang
Phone:	0086-18055211309
FAX:	0086-552-3822922
Mobile:	0086-18055211309
WebSite:	www.iotachem.com www.siliconeoil.net
Email:	zyf@siliconeoil.cn
QQ:

News > Dynamic industry > Transparent Barrier Coatings for Plastic Films: PHPS or Organopolysilazane?

Transparent Barrier Coatings for Plastic Films: PHPS or Organopolysilazane?

If the primary requirements are a thin, transparent coating with relatively high inorganic barrier performance, perhydropolysilazane (PHPS) can be evaluated first. If the film must withstand repeated bending, winding or substantial deformation, organopolysilazane or a composite coating should receive greater consideration. Selection cannot be based on hardness alone. The plastic type, coating thickness, curing conditions, solvent compatibility and bending radius must also be verified.

Why Can’t a Glass or Metal Coating System Be Applied Directly to Flexible Plastics?

Glass and metal generally have higher dimensional stability. Plastics such as PET, PI, PC, PMMA, PE and PP respond differently to heat, bending and solvent exposure.

When a plastic substrate stretches or bends, a hard surface coating is subjected to tensile or compressive stress. If the coating modulus is high, the film is too thick or adhesion is insufficient, the following problems may occur:

microcracking or visible cracking;
reduced barrier performance after bending;
lifting or delamination at the coating edges;
changes in transparency or haze;
solvent attack, swelling or stress cracking of the substrate;
film shrinkage or deformation caused by excessive curing temperature.

Therefore, “the harder the coating, the better” does not apply to every flexible film.

When Is PHPS Worth Considering?

Under suitable conditions, PHPS can convert into an inorganic network consisting mainly of SiOₓ. It can therefore be evaluated for applications requiring transparency, a thin coating and relatively high gas-barrier performance.

Published studies have used PHPS to form barrier coatings on PET and other polymer films. However, performance depends on coating amount, pretreatment, curing method and conversion degree. This does not mean that PHPS can be applied directly to every plastic.

The inorganic layer produced from PHPS is generally relatively rigid. When the substrate must bend frequently, the dry-film thickness should be controlled and the coating should undergo static-bend, repeated-bend and post-bending barrier tests.

When Is Organopolysilazane Worth Considering?

Organopolysilazanes retain organic side groups in their molecular structure. Their cured network, flexibility, hydrophobicity and processing window differ from those of PHPS, making them candidates for flexible protection, transparent coatings or composite systems.

However, “organic” does not guarantee freedom from cracking. Excessive crosslink density, excessive coating thickness, overly rapid curing or insufficient substrate adhesion may still create defects.

Published research indicates that organopolysilazanes can be used on glass, plastic and metal substrates. Coating method, solvent evaporation and ambient moisture can significantly affect coating uniformity and defect formation.

When Should a Composite Coating Be Considered?

If one material cannot simultaneously meet barrier, hardness and bending requirements, possible directions include:

a flexible primer combined with a thin polysilazane top layer;
organopolysilazane blended with another film-forming resin;
multiple thin coats instead of one thick coat;
localized inorganic conversion or an organic–inorganic gradient structure;
other barrier materials suitable for flexible substrates.

Composite systems must be tested for interlayer adhesion, curing sequence, solvent compatibility and long-term bending performance. A formulation developed for another substrate should not be copied directly.

Which Conditions Must Be Confirmed Before Selection?

At minimum, confirm:

whether the substrate is PET, PI, PC, PMMA, PE, PP or another plastic;
film thickness and surface-treatment method;
whether the target is scratch resistance, oxygen barrier, moisture barrier, stain resistance or combined protection;
permitted curing temperature, humidity and time;
coating method and target dry-film thickness;
whether winding, folding or repeated bending is required;
minimum bending radius and expected bending cycles;
requirements for light transmission, haze and appearance;
whether the substrate tolerates the solvents in the formulation;
exposure to moisture, chemicals or high-low temperature cycling.

A specific polysilazane grade should not be recommended when these conditions are incomplete.

Common Selection Mistakes

Comparing Pencil Hardness Only

Hardness cannot replace adhesion, flexibility, abrasion resistance or post-bending barrier testing.

Applying a Glass Formulation Directly to Plastic

Plastic differs from glass in surface energy, solvent resistance and heat resistance. Pretreatment and curing conditions must be revalidated.

Assuming a Thicker Single Coat Is Always Better

A thick coating may improve barrier performance but also increases internal stress and cracking risk. The effective thickness should be determined through a thickness-gradient trial.

Assuming Stronger Surface Treatment Is Always Better

Corona, plasma or primer treatment may improve wetting and adhesion, but excessive treatment can damage the film surface.

Testing Only the Initial Bend

A coating that does not crack initially may still lose barrier performance after ageing, heat and humidity exposure, or repeated bending.

Recommended Selection Procedure

First, confirm the plastic type, surface condition and temperature/solvent-resistance limits. Second, screen PHPS, organopolysilazane or composite systems according to the required balance of barrier performance and flexibility. Third, establish gradients for surface treatment, dry-film thickness and curing conditions. Fourth, test appearance, adhesion, hardness and initial barrier performance. Fifth, repeat the tests after repeated bending, damp-heat exposure and temperature cycling.

As a global silicone solutions provider, IOTA Silicone Oil (Anhui) Co., Ltd. can assist in screening PHPS, organopolysilazane, silicone resins and related silicone materials for flexible-film coating applications. The specific material and process should be determined from the actual substrate and verified test results.

Related materials:

FAQ

Can PHPS Be Applied Directly to PET Film?

Some PHPS systems can form barrier coatings on PET, but surface treatment, solvent compatibility, curing temperature, coating thickness and bending performance must be verified.

Is Organopolysilazane Always More Flexible Than PHPS?

This cannot be determined from the material name alone. Flexibility also depends on the organic side groups, crosslink density, formulation, coating thickness and curing conditions.

Is a Thinner Polysilazane Coating Less Likely to Crack?

Reducing thickness appropriately usually helps reduce bending stress, but an excessively thin layer may compromise coverage and barrier performance. A thickness-gradient trial is required.

Does High Pencil Hardness Mean Good Film Protection?

No. Flexible-film applications also require verification of adhesion, abrasion resistance, bending radius and barrier performance after bending.

Why Is Adhesion More Difficult on PE and PP Films?

PE and PP normally have low surface energy. Corona, plasma, primer or another surface-treatment method may therefore need to be evaluated before coating.