Dow Corning patent disallowed enika silica gel breaking patent blockade-Iota

Products

News

Office Address:	Sunmoon Science Park, 985 Xingzhong Road, High-Tech Zone, Bengbu, China
Factory Address:	Mohekou Industrial Park, Huaishang District, Bengbu, Anhui, China
Contact:	Nathan Zhang
Phone:	0086-552-19805521900
FAX:	0086-552-3822922
Mobile:	19805521900/18119733779
WebSite:	www.siliconeoil.cn www.siliconeoil.net
Email:
QQ:	729118868

Service > Dow Corning patent disallowed enika silica gel breaking patent blockade

Dow Corning patent disallowed enika silica gel breaking patent blockade

Entanglement for nearly a year of Dow Corning of domestic packaging silicone enterprises tiantianyangguang patent infringement case finally settled to the bottom. Ultimately, the case with Dow Corning involved patent was ruled invalid end!
On May 18, 2015, the Patent Reexamination Board of the State Intellectual Property Office issued a formal declared patent number of Dow Corning Toray invent patent No. ZL03824673.2 -- "curable organopolysiloxane composition and manufactured using the composition, semiconductor devices" patents are invalid.
It is understood that the application for the patent right for September 8, 2003, the priority for October 28, 2002, the authorized announcement date for February 14, 2007.
On April 14, 2014, Beijing Kang Meite received subpoenas issued by the Shanghai Municipal First Intermediate People's court, Dow Corning Toray authorized the Dow Corning Corporation Investment Co., Ltd. to Kang U.S. companies KMT-1269 products filed civil action, advocate tiantianyangguang products infringe Shi Tao Kang Ning patent for the ZL200480028707.8 invention patent No. enjoy. In September 4, 2014, the China Electronic Materials Industry Association commissioned Beijing Lin Daliu intellectual property agency submitted a patent application in the case of an invalid request.
At the same time, on the 17th of December 2014, the Patent Reexamination Board of the State Intellectual Property Office also issued a formal, declared the patent number Tao Shikang Ning Dongli Corporation for 200480028707.8 invention patent No.: "curable organopolysiloxane composition, and semiconductor device" patent all invalid. Due to the patent involved is declared invalid in whole, Dow Corning Investment Co., Ltd. in Shanghai First Intermediate People's court prosecution Beijing tiantianyangguang Technology Co., Ltd. led with organosilicon encapsulation adhesive, KMT-1269 patent infringement case also will be because of the lack of the basis of the right of litigation and was rejected.
January 20, 2015, Shanghai First Intermediate People's Court issued a document, formally ruled that: in view of the involved patent by the State Intellectual Property Office of the examination of the Patent Reexamination Board, was declared invalid in whole, so patent rights in an unstable state, Dow Corning Investment Co., Ltd. Beijing tiantianyangguang Technology Co., Ltd. infringement patent sue, do not meet the conditions of admissibility, Dow Corning rejected prosecution.
March 31, 2015, the State Intellectual Property Office of the Patent Reexamination Board for the Dow Corning's patent invalidation request to open the oral hearing.
On May 18, 2015, the Patent Reexamination Board of the State Intellectual Property Office issued a formal, declared Kang the ZL03824673.2 number Dow Ning involved patents are invalid.
So far, almost 1 years of patent infringement patent infringement finally came to an end. To back Dow Corning silicone on the domestic enterprises of infringement proceedings, China Electronics Materials Industry Association raise patents as a weapon, to help domestic electronic packaging silicone enterprises sued Dow Corning Investment Co., Ltd. patent dispute once again achieved a complete success.
Talk about the views of the patent litigation, Beijing tiantianyangguang Technology Co., Ltd., general manager of the Ge Shili firm said, our products completely independent research and development results. Our high-end high refractive silicone encapsulation adhesive products is in the company for many years of accumulated technology based, independent research and development. Company's silicone polymer materials technology platform enjoy special government allowances of the State Council by their professor Li led the establishment, Professor Li is our chief scientist, silicone well-known experts in the field of professor. "
The Dow Corning patent litigation is actually a kind of commercial competition means." Ge Shili went on to say that "in fact, Dow Corning after receiving the invalidation of a patent has the right requirements with modified reduced the original rights requirements, take the initiative to give up part of the rights. A itself is suspected of "Happy Valley enclosure", are very unstable patents as a basis for action and in court has yet to make a decision, hype on its website, which allows us to have to wonder if it is to take to create false media to mislead customers. Hope that by suppressing the typical, deter other domestic brands, while the downstream packaging companies in order to prevent the involvement of the domestic brands, so as not to use, so as to restore its monopoly position."
LED industry patent disputes are nothing new, from the chip to the package and then to the material, the patent war has been accompanied by the development of the entire industry. Due to the awareness, experience, financial strength, personnel equipped with the international giants compared to domestic enterprises also there is a huge gap, "patent game" has never been for international giants control. Have to admit is that no longer bright sometimes "patent" in the commercial competition plays a role, it became a "double-edged sword", it is no longer "umbrella" of innovation, innovation has become a "stumbling block".
Interview, Ge Shili admits, this patent litigation. For a young Beijing Kang Meite perhaps and is not a bad thing. He said, through the patent litigation, we have a new understanding of 'patent', 'intellectual property protection'. In the past, we have always confused 'patent' and 'technology', the inherent in the field of materials, the concept of patent application process is very easy to disclose the core of the formulation and process, in fact, otherwise. Patent is a legal category, it is the boundary of the core invention in the logical language, although it is based on technology, but it is not equivalent to the technology itself."
'' patent 'is an important weapon in the commercial competition, which can attack and retreat.

Feedback to "Iota Silicone Oil (Anhui) Co., Ltd."