Chinese PV industry joint fight against the United States double reverse-Iota

Products

News

Office Address:	Sunmoon Science Park, 985 Xingzhong Road, High-Tech Zone, Bengbu, China
Factory Address:	Mohekou Industrial Park, Huaishang District, Bengbu, Anhui, China
Contact:	Nathan Zhang
Phone:	0086-552-19805521900
FAX:	0086-552-3822922
Mobile:	19805521900/18119733779
WebSite:	www.siliconeoil.cn www.siliconeoil.net
Email:
QQ:	729118868

Service > Chinese PV industry joint fight against the United States double reverse

Chinese PV industry joint fight against the United States double reverse

Although the United States was in 2011 against Chinese PV launched the first "double reverse", which still accounts for 2013 to the Chinese PV exports 10%, ranking the third largest overseas Chinese PV market.

However, in January this year, the United States once again launched a comprehensive and rigorous intended to limit Chinese exports to the US crystalline silicon PV products second "double reverse" investigation, if the final implementation, the impact on China PV is self-evident. Not only that, the influence of the European Union, the United States have launched the "dual" India, Australia, also joined in the fun.

May 21, International Solar Industry and Photovoltaic Exhibition (hereinafter referred to as SNEC) period, China Machinery and Electronic Products Import and Export Chamber of Commerce, the China Renewable Energy Society, China Photovoltaic Industry Association, China Association of circular economy Renewable Energy Professional Committee, Asian Photovoltaic Industry Association on behalf of China photovoltaic industry issued an official joint statement, the US "double reverse" survey expressed strong opposition.

It is worth mentioning that the Deputy Secretary-General of China CCCME Sunguang Bin against India, Australia's "dual" said, "Recently, we have hired law firms and other relevant agencies, to Australia, India 'dual' investigation Application of representativeness questioned. I think that China and Australia, trade friction between India, will achieve a settlement or withdrawal of future results. "

In addition, Artes chairman Qu Xiaohua, apart from the United States on behalf of the vast majority of cheap solar Alliance solar energy companies, "double reverse" the US government expressed opposition to the outer; as of now, US Vice President Joe Biden, five US senators Congressman, former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg and other government personnel, also expressed opposition to trade barriers.

Chinese PV industry issued a joint statement

The annual SNEC, is definitely a good opportunity to spy industry status quo. According to the "Securities Times" reporter observed, compared to the previous winter coincided industry SNEC, although this industry, "leading" GCL, Yingli, Trina, Artes, Jinko Solar, LDK LDK, Suntech, Hina and so full debut, and the momentum is more vast, but Booth was a slight reduction in the total amount of the venue.

Consistent with this change, the recent times, one after another by overseas Chinese PV companies "dual" in the hunt. Especially the United States launched the second "double reverse" on the Chinese PV is quite far-reaching.

Qu Xiaohua introduction, the United States is a steady growth in market size reached 5GW-6GW, Chinese photovoltaic products accounted for 50%, in terms of export volume of about $ 2 billion -30 billion. But beyond the intuitive economic losses, may involve behind the Chinese PV industry up to hundreds of thousands of public employees, "Some front-line employees facing unemployment and therefore, these people engaged in PV, very difficult to find a similar salary standard work. " Qu Xiaohua said.

"The publication of the joint statement on behalf of China photovoltaic means we still hope the two sides to negotiate to resolve trade disputes through consultations." Tian Liang Yingli Director of Public Relations to the "Securities Daily" reporters, "This is the first time almost all Chinese PV industry associations, organizations alongside the sound. "

Sunguang Bin PV industry in China against the United States the second "dual" press conference, on behalf of China photovoltaic industry issued a strongly worded joint statement.

Joint statement, China's PV products are recognized around the world mainly due to its higher cost, better product quality and more comprehensive after-sales service, there is no dumping, but there is no illegal subsidy. Trade protection seriously hamper the development industry, but also an obstacle to the development of photovoltaic applications in the United States, the US real economy and solve the employment problem.

Sunguang Bin stressed that this United States launched the second "double reverse" survey, aimed primarily component sourcing in Taiwan, China and other third-country market economy in China battery assembly. According to the US Department of Commerce in the last round of "dual" survey finds that conclusion, "the origin of cells determine the origin of the components." In the same logic, the mainland assembly of the investigation does not belong to the Chinese mainland origin , the United States Department of Commerce should we not investigate products in mainland China.

US "double reverse" dog in the manger

In fact, since 2011, the United States, the European Union has on Chinese photovoltaic products launched anti-dumping and countervailing investigations, resulting in a negative impact on Chinese PV companies, but also a drag on the healthy development of domestic PV application market, resulting in a huge loss of jobs . According to the report of the European Photovoltaic Industry Association, by the EU's "double reverse" measures on the EU in 2013 than forecast at the beginning of the annual installation dropped by 16%. The last round of the US "double reverse" has been on the market a great impact.

Under the plan, the US Commerce Department will announce preliminary countervailing June 2 results on July 28 announced the preliminary results of anti-dumping, December 11 announced anti-dumping, countervailing final ruling. January 26, 2015, the US International Trade Commission will decide whether a final tax.

The release of the joint statement noted that the Chinese PV industry there is no dumping, but there is no illegal subsidies for Chinese PV accusations untrue Chinese PV products with a higher price, better product quality and more comprehensive after-sales service to win consumers around the world are widely recognized and popular, in full compliance with the principles of fair market competition, is the result of market choices.

China PV industry and national PV industry is complementary interests of the community, the Chinese PV in their own development, but also brings more opportunities and life into the world photovoltaic development. Chinese PV companies and equipment from the United States, raw material suppliers and downstream distributors, installers, technical service providers and other established close cooperative relations in the United States to ease the employment pressure, etc., to make a positive contribution.

Any form of trade protection, any level of punitive tariffs, the negative impact on the Chinese PV companies at the same time, the United States will become an obstacle to the development of photovoltaic applications, all US real economy and employment will have a significant negative impact.

SolarWorld for their own gain, for the Chinese PV companies have repeatedly raised unreasonable demands, damages not only the interests of the Chinese PV companies, such irrational fight kidnapping is the Sino-US photovoltaic industry. Such acts continue to create trade friction, is bound to damage Sino-US trade relations between the two economies.

Therefore, we strongly appeal to the American government, from the China-US trade cooperation and the establishment of new relations between big powers perspective, and properly resolve trade disputes between the two countries, the creation of a fair and free environment for the development of the photovoltaic industry. Meanwhile, the Chinese PV companies will continue to actively respond to, and to pay all efforts to resolutely defend their legitimate rights and interests.

Feedback to "Iota Silicone Oil (Anhui) Co., Ltd."